G-BGRGZ2TY47

Jesus, Mobs and Mercy

Last week I wrote about the constant litany of terrible things that happen all around us, and how to deal with the associated burden of grief (link). To follow up, I have also been fascinated by watching the way we respond when bad things happen to good people, and also when bad things happen to bad people. There is plenty to observe.

One story from Christ’s life keeps coming to my mind, so I’d better mention it. First, the story as John wrote it (John 8:2-11)

And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and taught them. And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,

They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act. Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?

This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not. So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.”

And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.

And they which heard it, being convicted by their ownconscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.

When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?

She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more. 

A few thoughts:

• The public execution mentality the scribes and the Pharisees displayed was not uncommon for the time. The Law of Moses DID dictate that adulterers could be stoned. In this instance, it was not out of character, nor unjustified.

• One interesting aspect of stoning is that the witnesses throw the first stones, then every member of the community throws a stone – that way each individual participant could make the same claim: “Hey, it wasn’t ME, I didn’t kill her!”  Essentially, you get “killed by committee.”

• The group did go to the Savior with the hope of tricking Him into saying something that would either a) be blasphemous, or b) get Him in trouble with the Romans who ruled at that time.

• Jesus had already been on the other end of the mob mentality. They tried to throw Him off a cliff (Luke 4:30), and later in the very same chapter (John 8:59), they attempt to stone Him as well – same gang, again at the temple.

• Rather than lead or join the mob in stoning the woman, Jesus did something completely different: He ignored them. Flat out refusing to get caught up in the groupthink hysteria.

• Instead, He busied Himself writing in the dirt. Now, I might be wrong on this, but the only other time I can find a reference to Jesus ever writing something was when He wrote out the 10 Commandments for Moses – in stone, with His finger. (Exodus 31:18) I would LOVE to know what He wrote in the dirt!

• He then put everything into an perspective with one, brutal charge: “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.” While they processed the damning question, He got back to ignoring them, and writing on the ground.

• Whatever He wrote, and the reproof He served them, seemed to take the wind out of their sails, and send them off, one by one. In my imagination, I can hear the stones hitting the ground as they were sheepishly dropped by the departing accusers.

• After the crowd dispersed, Christ then got about His business. He told the woman, essentially: “Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.”

• He didn’t humiliate her, demean her, or make fun of her. He did not damn her, threaten her or lecture her. (Although He rightfully could have.) He did not gather His followers or disciples around and make a public spectacle of her sin – quite the contrary – He had just helped that very thing to blow over.

• What He did do was condemn the sin. He assuredly did not tell her it was “okay.” He told her to knock it off. Then He sent her away. Alive, with a new chance for a better life.

• From the Joseph Smith Translation, we learn that afterwards, she was a changed woman, “And the woman glorified God from that hour, and believed on his name.”

• Christ showed mercy, instead of vengeance. Kindness instead of rage. He minimized the public involvement, rather than putting her on display. It was a personal, quiet moment between the two, a stunning contrast to what might have happened, had the crowd had their way.

Where am I going with this? I’ll try and distill it before I dissect it: For every terrible thing that someone does, we have the agency to choose our reaction. It seems that more and more often, our reactions resemble the mob groupthink mentality, rather than the quiet mercy the Savior showed.

Case in point: I was having a conversation with a friend about some terrible thing someone had done, and my friend said this: “I’m not going to pass judgment on him – at least not until I have more details about what happened.”

I’ve been chewing on that phrase all week, because I’m pretty sure I have said similar things lately. It is sticky. You see it, right?

First of all, when I start a sentence with “I’m not going to pass judgment on him,” I should stop right there. Why? Because as soon as I add conditions, such as “until I have more details,” I am opening the door to joining the mob.

And it is a very active, angry, loud and welcoming mob. Our impulse to grab a verbal pitchfork and start chanting is a very natural thing. “The natural man and woman in each of us has a tendency to condemn others and to judge unrighteously, or self-righteously.” (Elder Lynn G. Robbins)

President George Albert Smith adds this: “But if we have the spirit of fault finding … in a destructive manner, that never comes as a result of the companionship of the Spirit of our Heavenly Father and is always harmful.” (link)

“Always.”

I am sure that Christ’s example to us would serve me well when I am struggling with my ‘Natural Man’ inclinations to condemn and “verbally stone” adulterers, or cowardly policemen, or sloppy detectives, or dishonest politicians, or mass murderers, or social and political pundits, or anyone who disagrees with me about anything.

But it is not my place. I don’t have to pick up a stone and join the fray. I shouldn’t pick up a stone and join the fray. Public executions are no longer part of our religious law.

Finding that degree of mercy and charity is not always simple. Sometimes the offenses that happen seem so egregious that I feel compelled to pick up a torch, a pitchfork or a stone, create a hashtag, and shout about it from the rooftops. It feels strangely noble to actively hate the sinner and the sin – even if the sinner – or their sin – did not impact me directly.

Yet it is not my place. I am charged to forgive. I can ignore. As painfully simple as it sounds, this instance is one where the mantra “What would Jesus do?” is perfectly clear.

Christ would eventually be brought before a mob who would chant “Crucify him.” He knew His own public execution was still to come. Even so, he still taught, “Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt lovethy neighbour, and hate thine enemy. Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven:” (Matthew 5:43-45)

#Mercy

Elder Dale G. Renlund said last April, “…in our lifelong quest to follow Jesus Christ, His example of kindness to those who sin is particularly instructive. We, who are sinners, must, like the Savior, reach out to others with compassion and love. Our role is also to help and bless, lift and edify, and replace fear and despair with hope and joy…Jesus Christ also set the example for us to follow—to show respect to all and hatred toward none.” (link)

If I had been alive 2,000 years ago, I’d be pretty sure the woman did commit adultery, as they caught her in the act. I am also sure that I would understand the Law and its consequences as it applied at the time. I also, sadly, recognize that I might very well have picked up a rock…

Thankfully, the Savior has shown me what mercy looks like. He has exemplified what it means to forgive. He has taught me the beauty of second-chances. He has helped me understand that judging others is rarely my business, and condemning them is never my business. I’ve got enough stuff to worry about that I don’t need to add public executions to my plate, thankyouverymuch.

I do not need to pick up a rock.

If you want to dig in deeper to how these things fit within our current culture, read Elder Christofferson’s epic talk from last April Conference. It is truly jaw-dropping and prescient. “The Voice of Warning.”

Etching by. Carl Bloch, “Writing in the Sand.”

Here

About the author

Comments

  1. Good point. It never does! I guess I just assumed it, since it’s the answer that makes the most sense.

  2. You know, MMM, there’s another reference to God writing in Daniel 5. Here it is:
    5 ¶ In the same hour came forth fingers of a man’s hand, and wrote over against the candlestick upon the plaster of the wall of the king’s palace: and the king saw the part of the hand that wrote.
    6 Then the king’s countenance was changed, and his thoughts troubled him, so that the joints of his loins were loosed, and his knees smote one against another.
    7 The king cried aloud to bring in the astrologers, the Chaldeans, and the soothsayers. And the king spake, and said to the wise men of Babylon, Whosoever shall read this writing, and shew me the interpretation thereof, shall be clothed with scarlet, and have a chain of gold about his neck, and shall be the third ruler in the kingdom.
    8 Then came in all the king’s wise men: but they could not read the writing, nor make known to the king the interpretation thereof.
    9 Then was king Belshazzar greatly troubled, and his countenance was changed in him, and his lords were astonied.
    10 ¶ Now the queen, by reason of the words of the king and his lords, came into the banquet house: and the queen spake and said, O king, live for ever: let not thy thoughts trouble thee, nor let thy countenance be changed:
    11 There is a man in thy kingdom, in whom is the spirit of the holy gods; and in the days of thy father light and understanding and wisdom, like the wisdom of the gods, was found in him; whom the king Nebuchadnezzar thy father, the king, I say, thy father, made master of the magicians, astrologers, Chaldeans, and soothsayers;

    12 Forasmuch as an excellent spirit, and knowledge, and understanding, interpreting of dreams, and shewing of hard sentences, and dissolving of doubts, were found in the same Daniel, whom the king named Belteshazzar: now let Daniel be called, and he will shew the interpretation.
    13 Then was Daniel brought in before the king. And the king spake and said unto Daniel, Art thou that Daniel, which art of the children of the captivity of Judah, whom the king my father brought out of Jewry?
    14 I have even heard of thee, that the spirit of the gods is in thee, and that light and understanding and excellent wisdom is found in thee.
    15 And now the wise men, the astrologers, have been brought in before me, that they should read this writing, and make known unto me the interpretation thereof: but they could not shew the interpretation of the thing:
    16 And I have heard of thee, that thou canst make interpretations, and dissolve doubts: now if thou canst read the writing, and make known to me the interpretation thereof, thou shalt be clothed with scarlet, and have a chain of gold about thy neck, and shalt be the third ruler in the kingdom.
    17 ¶ Then Daniel answered and said before the king, Let thy gifts be to thyself, and give thy rewards to another; yet I will read the writing unto the king, and make known to him the interpretation.
    18 O thou king, the most high God gave Nebuchadnezzar thy father a kingdom, and majesty, and glory, and honour:
    19 And for the majesty that he gave him, all people, nations, and languages, trembled and feared before him: whom he would he slew; and whom he would he kept alive; and whom he would he set up; and whom he would he put down.
    20 But when his heart was lifted up, and his mind hardened in pride, he was deposed from his kingly throne, and they took his glory from him:
    21 And he was driven from the sons of men; and his heart was made like the beasts, and his dwelling was with the wild asses: they fed him with grass like oxen, and his body was wet with the dew of heaven; till he knew that the most high God ruled in the kingdom of men, and that he appointeth over it whomsoever he will.
    22 And thou his son, O Belshazzar, hast not humbled thine heart, though thou knewest all this;
    23 But hast lifted up thyself against the Lord of heaven; and they have brought the vessels of his house before thee, and thou, and thy lords, thy wives, and thy concubines, have drunk wine in them; and thou hast praised the gods of silver, and gold, of brass, iron, wood, and stone, which see not, nor hear, nor know: and the God in whose hand thy breath is, and whose are all thy ways, hast thou not glorified:
    24 Then was the part of the hand sent from him; and this writing was written.
    25 ¶ And this is the writing that was written, Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin.
    26 This is the interpretation of the thing: Mene; God hath numbered thy kingdom, and finished it.
    27 Tekel; Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found wanting.
    28 Peres; Thy kingdom is divided, and given to the Medes and Persians.
    There you go!

    1. I thought of this, but as I read it, I never saw where it was claimed it was God’s hand. (Maybe I didn’t read it carefully enough.)

  3. This story has always interested me… If the woman was caught in the very act, wasn’t the man she committed adultery with also caught in the very act?

    1. We have no idea, so it seems it wasn’t an integral part of the story as far as John was concerned. I see this a lot, as if by omitting the other half of the story presents some sort of unfairness, or other illogical ideas.

      My understanding is that both halves of such an offense get the same punishment. (Unlike many Middle-Eastern religions today.) It is possible that the man was already killed, and the scribes kept the woman alive in an attempt to manipulate Christ into the trap.

      We simply don’t know.

  4. This subject has been on my mind the past couple of weeks. Can’t thank you enough for this post.

  5. My understanding is that both the man and the woman would be punished in this circumstance. We really don’t know what happened to the man. For all we know, he could have already been killed

  6. I’ve been reading your posts for a couple years now and am always amazed with how much I agree with you. It is comforting to know other members of the Church think the same thoughts. After being deployed to Afghanistan over the past year, this post really spoke to me. I whole-heartedly say “amen”!

  7. It seems the older I get, the less energy I have for judging. I haven’t lived a perfect life and have been thankful for those who have loved me anyway.

Add your 2¢. (Be nice.)