G-BGRGZ2TY47

I’m Sorry to Have to Be the One to Tell you…

I recently attended our ward Halloween Party. (Oops – sorry to offend with a pagan word) Our “Trunk-or-Treat”, or our “Fall Festival” (you know – Halloween party) While I was there I saw the sweet little children who just recently stood with shining halos and sang like little angels in our sacrament meeting Primary program. They had undergone a jarring transformation. Gone were the halos and glowing countenances, replaced with something more like costumed versions of this:
Milling around the party were mortified mothers, many uttering similar versions of the same thing:
“We are never going to bed tonight.”
“I wonder how long it will take for my kid to come down.”
“This is why I hate Halloween.”
“C’mere and give me that dark chocolate”
All of these moms were lovely intelligent, caring mothers – all concerned about the same thing. The nefarious SUGAR HIGH. Yes, that common condition where refined sugar courses through our children’s veins and turns the most delightful of cherubs into maniacs. Maniacal princesses. Maniacal hobos. Maniacal clowns.
Soon these poor mothers would have to wrestle these rocket-fuel-powered children into their cars, take them home, wash off the face paint and attempt to get them to bed. In the meantime, the child will attempt to continue his candy bender like a Survivor contestant after a reward challenge.
Brace yourselves. Many of you may not want to hear this next part. In fact, some of you will cover your ears and shake your heads and say “No, no no! Lies all lies. MMM we trusted you!”. I am sorry but here goes anyway:
There is no such thing as a “Sugar High”.
There it is. That child in your kitchen that is spinning like a top because he ate some sugar? It ain’t the sugar. Yeah, bummer.
Scientist have been trying to establish a link between hyperactive behavior and sugar consumption for years – and they just can’t do it. There isn’t one. The “Sugar High” is merely a myth. An urban legend. A suburban legend too.  So you know that I am not making this up to hurt you, I have listed a whole bunch of links to articles about this. I tried to find some of the more respected sources, rather than “Stan & LaVerne’s Herbal Solutions for Medicinal Purposes Only” website.
I know, some of you are struggling with this new information, but ask yourself “Has MMM ever led me astray?” Wait – don’t ask yourself that. Ask yourself “How can scientists be so stupid?“. If it makes you feel better.
So, I guess now I have to explain the ramifications. Why then are these crazed children crazed after eating sugar? There are a few reasons which I will summarize:
1) Your kid is really like that all the time, and you only notice at large, embarrassing, public gatherings.
2) They call it a “Parental Placebo Effect”. Parents expect their kids to get hyper, so they ascribe any behavioral change to the sugar.
3) Sugar often comes with caffeine. Caffeine is the demon.
4) Sugar and kids hang around at exiting things – holidays, birthday parties, etc. The fun event kicks up the adrenaline.
5) Parents unintentionally teach their kids that sugar consumption is an excuse to go nuts. (Stop eating that candy – I don’t want you getting all hyper!)
6) My child is a scientific anomaly. Yes, all the scientists are wrong, because they never studied my child – and by golly, I know my own child a whole lot better than they do.
If you really want to dig in, there is lots of info on this. But this myth is definitely “busted”. Does it change the fact that there are a zillion hyper kids running around this time of year? No. They are still going to be wound up and torturing each other, whatever the underlying cause. But now at least we know it ain’t the sugar.
So, armed with this new information, let’s say goodbye to that old scapegoat and have a Happy Halloween! Autumn Celebration, Fall Festival, Harvest Days, Oktoberfest? I guess we’ll stick with plain old October 31st.

http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=52516
http://articles.cnn.com/1999-11-22/health/9911_22_diet.sugar.myth.kids.wmd_1_sugar-and-hyperactivity-hyperactive-children-researchers?_s=PM:HEALTH
http://news.consumerreports.org/health/2009/01/medical-myths.html
http://www.dukehealth.org/health_library/news/5648
http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=holiday-sugar-high-08-12-22
http://www.ccmr.cornell.edu/education/ask/index.html?quid=241
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperactivity#Sugar_consumption
http://www.fao.org/docrep/W8079E/w8079e0o.htm


Discover more from Thus We See...

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

About the author

Comments

  1. I studied this in my nutrition class in college a few years ago and nobody believed me when I said it. *Sigh* People just believe what they want to believe.

  2. also, red dye and yellow dye can cause hyper activity. In other countries they actually have to place a warning on food containing artificial dye!

  3. But, seriously, my EC was very happy you blogged about this. She’s been trying to preach this doctrine for years and years. One of her boys has ADHD, and comments like, “Somebody’s had enough sugar” or “Don’t give that kid any candy” really hurt him, and made his mother furious at the lack of understanding. So, thanks from Emilie. I still like the “Dinosaurs” clip though.

  4. I refuse to believe this tripe. My children get hyper because of candy/sugar (as do I). I got hyper as a child because of sugar. My mother and her mother before her also got hyper when given sugar in a soothing cup of coffee…

    I’m just gonna go ahead and say it…

    How can scientists be so STUPID?? 🙂

  5. Ha- love it! It is easy to get in the habit of saying it’s the sugar high even if we know it’s NOT! I’m trying my hardest to avoid all things Halloween this year and it’s hard. I sure wish there were no trunk-or-treat and that I could think of somewhere else to go when all those greedy little kids come knocking on my door.

  6. IDONTKNOWWHYPEOPLEWOULDTHINKSUGARMAKESYOUHYPERIMEANIVEEATENHALFOFMYKIDSCANDYFROMOURHALLOWEENPARTYANDIFEELFINENOTHYPERATALLSUGARGETSSUCHABAD….zzZZZzzzzzZZ

  7. John: That is amazing that you remembered, and tracked down that clip. I don’t know if I should be impressed, or worried about you.

    Diane: I may be wrong, but I think the wet diaper and full moon are legitimate.

  8. It may not give them a sugar high, but it sure gives some kids an extra boost of quick energy. And it may not be the sugar that is the problem in the treats, could be the artificial flavors, colors, preservatives, etc. My question is why do we as LDS even celebrate Halloween, a Catholic holiday with pagan origins? Why isn’t there a First Presidency Halloween Devotional? Clue!

  9. I’m looking forward to our ward Halloween party this evening. I love gathering with friends and singing all the Halloween church hymns.

  10. Or you could do what our ward did and not hold one.

    What?

    Yup! If anybody really wants to be around little hellions they can go to the other ward’s trunk or treat. We’ve done it that way for four years running. Heavenly!

    And for truth’s sake – only about three families from our ward go. The rest would rather stay at home with calmer kids!

  11. Rats. Now I have to come up with yet another reason for the whole ‘kids are swinging from the lights’ scenario and whatever-could-have caused-it???! I have always blamed it on fullmoon/halfmoon/newmoon/
    goldfish/fruit bites/cheerios/
    Church/sacrament bread/sacrament water/lack-of-rest/too-much-rest/wet diaper . . . and/or sugar. Now I have to start over???! Thanks. Thanks a lot!

  12. Funny, I just make sure I brush the kids teeth really well after the whatever you call it holiday and they are zonked out! It’s actually quite nice!

  13. Actually, as a diabetic, I would suspect that there is actually more of a tranquilizing effect from too much sugar. That’s what it does to us, anyway!

    Ahhh, the joys of trunk or treat! Crazy kids and all!!

    =)

  14. My mother just finished running our ward Halloween Carnival that the youth do for the Primary every year. She got a little stressed out when the bishopric member (who is nearing his 80’s if he’s not already there) announced it as a Fall Festival.

    Maybe she worried that kids wouldn’t come if it wasn’t extremely clear they could wear costumes and expect candy. She worked too hard to be defeated by a politically correct description!

    Luckily all the other announcements said “Halloween” so all that was missing were the YM leaders of the deacons. Maybe they were on strike due to the paganistic nature of the holiday celebrated?

    (My mom’s likely to read this, so she can correct me if need be! Goodness knows I wasn’t there for any of it.)

  15. Brandie, Brandie, Brandie. Again, your oversimplification is not working out for you. Neither one of these posts was about food.

    First, yesterday’s chili post was a nostalgic illustration as to how music can assist in the training of elementary skills. (Not really, it was to mock Wendy’s, and hear some funkified music)

    And second, today’s post was to reflect the shaky foundational aspects that some parents rely on while attempting to find a scapegoat for their children’s behavioral issues.

    Sheesh. Gotta dig a little deeper. (After all, that was you that spent your last blog post writing about how your child’s mucus on the windshield was not an air disaster. Correct?)

    NO CHILI FOR YOU!

  16. Okay, demon llama, maybe diatribes was a little harsh. How about dietary dwellings? Or dietary drivel? It was just that two food-related posts in a row totally threw off my groove. (Here’s where you say “Sooooorrrrrryyy!”)

    But denying me the world famous recipe just for sharing an opinion? Sheesh, Chili Nazi!

    I mean, Chili Nazi?

  17. Brandice: Less relevant posts? Diatribes? Can’t a guy try and be a little well rounded?

    No chili recipe for you!

    (But I am proud of you for appreciating ENG)

    Jennie: Yeah, an ill-placed question mark can completely ruin your impact. Thou shalt not kill?

  18. That was meant to be a statement, “i hate dark chocolate!” Guess I ruined that with one little punctuation error.

    But I’m totally behind you on the sugar thing. Those kids are already crazy brats. (Except mine.)

  19. MMM, I am behind the times, and also short on time, therefore I have had to skim over some of your less relevant posts… this one particularly. Not because I discount your scientific research, just because I prefer your spiritual messages over your dietary diatribes. But speaking of which, how about sharing your wife’s chili recipe? Mine is pretty good, excellent even, but there is always room for improvement and I would like to be serving the best chili in the world, even if I didn’t come up with it. And I will post a sign giving Mrs. MMM credit. Also, the Emperor’s New Groove is my favorite movie. It is even more hilarious if you watch it in French. And could you have more than two posts on a page? Maybe five or so? Just sayin. Lastly, I have been reading for a while and spent a fair amount of time composing a comment in response to A. Henline’s comment on your first long toes post. I was mad at the dirty dish lady for expecting a reward, and being judgmental of her is probably why my comment failed to post. Good thing you didn’t see that side of me. But just wanted to say thanks for the laughs and the insights, now that I have had a moment to catch up with your writings. I love Halloween candy, especially Almond Joys and Twix bars. And now that I have been all over the place and am making no sense whatsoever, I have to get back to work.

  20. In general, I agree and I always have. However, a few weeks ago I took my ADHD diagnosed twins to a local cupcakery for a treat before tehir counseling session. They had not had not had lunch but, hey, I was trying to spoil them! The cupcakes were SO rich with more buttery frosting than cake! I persanlly got a headache from mine. The kids didn’t even finish theirs! Then we went to the Dr’s office where they proceeded to literally bounce off the walls! I was shocked! My conclusion is that sugary treats, like alcohol, affects different people differntly. Thanks to military briefings I know that alcohol on an empty stomach makes you drunk (or sick) faster. Is it possible that too much straight sugar on the empty stomach of a 5 year old has similar results?

  21. I’m paying attention. And you are right in what you say. I had to put down a magazine the other day in real fury because there was an article, purporting to be real scientific truth, saying that organic meat is healthier than non-organic and over 50% of the population has a food allergy. Written by a “Holistic lifestyle coach” of course.

    Personally, I take all dietary advice with a pinch of salt.

    1. I personally think all the dietary advice that’s out there is just one of many of Satan’s tools to confuse us and get us to misuse our mortal bodies. So I’m totally with you. Definitely with a PINCH, not a grain, of salt.

  22. As a nurse, it is common knowledge to me that “sugar high” is a misnomer. In actuality when one’s blood sugar is elevated they will generally feel tired (i.e. Post-Turkey coma, anyone?). Perhaps it should be called a “sugar downer”?! But don’t get me wrong, I am not one to complain about any of it…because after my seven little munchkins do all the work and head to bed to dream about their sweet loot, guess who gets to raid the bags and comb for dark chocolate? 😉

  23. Oktoberfest? kids drinking beer? haha. I know there’s no such thing as a sugar high–the cub scouts act like animals the moment their feet hit the gym/cultural hall floor, long before the “refreshment” is served. I think maybe kids have an allergy to wood floors and that is what we should ban next….(totally kidding).

Add your 2¢. (Be nice.)

Discover more from Thus We See...

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading